| |
Introduction (p. 1) |
| |
Research techniques and methodology (p. 2) |
| |
|
The Praxis Cycle (p. 2) |
| |
|
Contextual Bible study (p. 3) |
| |
The story of the Levite’s Concubine in Judges 19–21 (p. 3) |
| |
|
On the text itself, reading of Judges 19–21 (p. 3) |
| |
|
A summary of the Judges 19–21 (p. 3) |
| |
On the text (a focus on the text as a literary composition), applying the Praxis Cycle (p. 4) |
| |
|
‘Agency’ in Judges 19–21, and on the text perspective: An interrogation (p. 4) |
| |
|
The rapists of Gibeah (p. 4) |
| |
|
The heinous act: The rape of the Levite’s concubine (p. 4) |
| |
The Levite seeks retribution by gruesome means (p. 4) |
| |
|
The retribution (p. 5) |
| |
|
A Statistical overview of Judges 19–21 civil war (p. 5) |
| |
|
Theological analysis of Judges 19–21 (p. 5) |
| |
|
|
Political – A nation without a king in dire straits (p. 5) |
| |
|
|
Religious – The religious identity of Israel and the presence of God (p. 6) |
| |
|
|
Economic: The cost of retribution and a grim picture of fatherless families (p. 6) |
| |
Reflections, recommendations and conclusion (p. 6) |
| |
|
Tackling gender-based violence and femicide Israel’s way (p. 6) |
| |
|
Provoking a response, the Levite’s way (p. 7) |
| |
|
A survey on whether gruesome pictures evoke any response (p. 7) |
| |
|
Crime and retribution (p. 7) |
| |
|
Spirituality, indignity and shame (p. 8) |
| |
Acknowledgements (p. 8) |
| |
Competing interests (p. 9) |
| |
Author’s contribution (p. 9) |
| |
Ethical considerations (p. 9) |
| |
Funding information (p. 9) |
| |
Data availability (p. 9) |
| |
Disclaimer (p. 9) |
| |
References (p. 9) |